Michigan Open Meetings ActMichigan law requires public meetings of public boards...
Michigan's Open Meetings Act or Michigan OMA provides the enforceable right for citizens to have actual access to meetings of public bodies and the right to know “what goes on” and “what was decided” by governmental officials serving on public bodies.
Meetings of public bodies must be conducted in the view of the public. A limited number of board discussions are permit in closed sessions but all votes must be public under Michigan law.
The Open Meetings Act applies to:
- the Michigan Legislature and its subcommittees;
- most state agencies and departments;
- counties and other local governments;
- school boards;
- many public boards, commissions, and councils; and
- public colleges and universities.
Michigan's Open Meetings Act also bans public bodies and its staff from requiring attendees to register or otherwise provide his or her name or other information to attend a public meeting. The right of the public to attend a meeting explicitly includes the right to tape-record. A meeting attendee is also explicitly permitted to address a public body at a public meeting. Public boards routinely and commonly provide a "public comment" section at each of its meetings.
Read more about OMA at the Michigan Freedom of Information Project, which we are proud to sponsor.
Protect Your RightsIf you are having issues with attending a public meeting, addressing a public body, or decisions being made in closed session, contact an Open Meetings Act attorney at Outside Legal Counsel today.
MID MICHIGANPO Box 107
Hemlock, MI 48626
(888) 398-7003 - fax
Licensed to practice before all Michigan State Courts, the Michigan Court of Appeals, the Michigan Supreme Court, the Saginaw Chippewa Tribal Court, the US District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court.
LATEST MEDIA NOTICEOLC recently filed a federal lawsuit against the Village of Oxford, its president, manager, and others alleging that its actions at a January 2017 meeting violated the constitutional rights of three members of the local police department.
OTHER RELEASESOLC's Ellison Admitted to Practice Before the US Supreme Court
OLC Requests Sixth Circuit En Banc Rehearing on First Amendment Recording Case
Former Cottrellville Supervisor Found Personally Liable in Open Meetings case